Benchmark between Hetzner, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr, OVH and UpCloud (January 2023)

In June 2022, we compared the performance of a number of major cloud providers. Technology does not stand still, so we are curious to see how these providers are doing now, six months later.

Benchmark between Hetzner, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr, OVH and UpCloud (January 2023)
Klik hier voor de Nederlandstalige versie.

The different types of cloud providers

In our June 2022 article, we took a closer look at the three different types of cloud providers. By this we mean hyperscalers such as Amazon AWS, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. In addition, the mid-segment providers in which we find players such as DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr, UpCloud and Hetzner. The last group of cloud providers are represented by local players such as Combell,, TransIP and Versio.

Check the updated January 2024 benchmark here.

Hyperscalers build and maintain their own data centers from which they offer their services. In their data centers they build their own networks and install their servers, which they often design themselves.

Google datacentrum
Google datacenter in Saint-Ghislain, Belgium.

The mid-market players mostly use existing data centers (Equinix, Interxion, TelecityGroup, etc.). They rent space in these data centers (colocation) and build their own network there, with their own servers. Hetzner is the odd one out here, because they have 3 data centers (two in Germany and one in Finland) of their own. In addition, Hetzner also rents space at other locations in the US.

Equinix datacentrum
Equinix SY5 IBX datacenter in Sydney, Australia.
Hetzner datacentrum
Hetzner datacenter in Falkenstein, Germany.

The local providers also use existing data centers, but often use smaller data centers that are close to their users. They also use their own servers and build out their own network, but on a smaller scale than the mid-market.

DC Burcht datacentrum
DC Burcht from DC Star in Burcht, Belgium.

In this benchmark we compare a number of mid-market providers. This comparison was made in January 2023. Newcomer in this benchmark is UpCloud.

What we compare

In this blog post we make a purely technical comparison based on benchmarks. Is that a complete comparison? No, certainly not. There is much more to the choice of a cloud provider than just the technical performance of a virtual machine. A lot also depends on your needs: Do you only need virtual machines and block storage? Or do you also want to run Kubernetes nodes? Perhaps you also want managed databases based on MongoDB, MySQL or PostgreSQL? Some providers only offer a few products, others offer several products. Do you want to host everything in one location, or do you want to use data centers all over the world? And not unimportant to include: the monthly price.

In this comparison, we therefore only focus on benchmark results of a comparable virtual machine and its monthly price. We make no further comparison between other products they offer, the accessibility and quality of their service desk, the possibility of SLAs, their reliability, the geographical presence, and so on. We leave that to you.

We compare the providers below (with the package in brackets) and the country of the head office. All the virtual machines (VMs) have 2 vCPUs and 4 GB of ram. If we could make the choice, we chose an Intel CPU. In each case, we selected a VM with a 'shared CPU' and local storage space.

In terms of cost, we pay to Hetzner, OVH and UpCloud in Euros and to DigitalOcean, Linode and Vultr in USD. In the table below we have converted USD's to Euro's. These prices are exclusive of VAT.

Provider Price per month
Hetzner € 5,35
DigitalOcean € 22,07
Linode € 18,40
Vultr € 18,40
OVH € 10,33
UpCloud € 26,00

In the graph below, we compare the monthly cost per provider with our benchmark in June 2022. The small variations of Linode and Vultr may be related to the USD - EUR exchange rate.

Cost per month for a VM with 2 vCPU and 4 GB ram.

The virtual machines had these specifications (so 2 vCPU and 4 GB ram each time):

Provider Processor GHz Chipset Disk Transfer / month
Hetzner Intel Xeon 2.1 Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC 40 GB 20 TB
DigitalOcean DO-Regular 2.2 Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC 80 GB 4 TB
Linode AMD EPYC 7642 2.3 Intel 82G33/G31/P35/P31 + ICH9 80 GB 4 TB
Vultr Intel Xeon 2.6 Intel 82G33/G31/P35/P31 + ICH9 80 GB 3 TB
OVH Intel Core 2.4 Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC 80 GB 3 TB
UpCloud Intel Xeon Gold 6136 3.0 Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC 80 GB 4 TB

How we compared the virtual machines

We ran the benchmarks on an Ubuntu 22.04 LTS installation. We used the Ubuntu installation as it was installed by the provider. We installed all updates, but made no further changes.

For the benchmarks we used Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4. Phoronix performed each test three times. When a standard deviation (deviation) greater than 2.5% was observed between tests, an additional test was performed until the standard deviation fell below 2.5%, with a maximum of 40 tests. The average value was recorded as the result.

We performed the benchmarks below, with a focus on the system, a single and multi core CPU, the ram memory, the storage space and the network.

  • pts/apache (focus on the systeem). This is a test of the Apache HTTPD web server. This Apache HTTPD web server benchmark test profile makes use of the Golang "Bombardier" program for facilitating the HTTP requests over a fixed period time with a configurable number of concurrent clients.
  • pts/hint (focus on single core CPU). This test runs the U.S. Department of Energy's Ames Laboratory Hierarchical INTegration (HINT) benchmark.
  • pts/compress-7zip (focues on multi core CPU). This is a test of 7-Zip compression/decompression with its integrated benchmark feature.
  • pts/stream (focus on the memory). This is a benchmark of Stream, the popular system memory (RAM) benchmark.
  • pts/postmark (focus on the storage). This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes.
  • pts/speedtest-cli (focus on the network). This test profile uses the open-source speedtest-cli client to benchmark your Internet connection's upload/download performance and latency against the servers. We did not manually select the servers.


Benchmark: pts/apache

Focus on the system. A higher score is better.

Test Hetzner DigitalOcean Linode Vultr OVH UpCloud
Concurrent Requests: 1 (Reqs/sec) 4248 4000 6169 5860 5348 7280
Concurrent Requests: 20 (Reqs/sec) 7013 7248 10368 8482 9769 11937
Concurrent Requests: 100 (Reqs/sec) 7226 6803 10200 9316 9240 11784
Concurrent Requests: 200 (Reqs/sec) 7379 6796 9915 9460 8900 11351
Concurrent Requests: 500 (Reqs/sec) 7162 6403 9689 9346 8815 10914
Concurrent Requests: 1000 (Reqs/sec) 6836 6550 9514 8900 8626 10725

Benchmark: pts/hint

Focus on single core CPU. A higher score is better.

Test Hetzner DigitalOcean Linode Vultr OVH UpCloud
FLOAT (QUIPs) 247.931.841 251.541.038 243.488.023 299.543.986 228.757.080 284.535.615

Benchmark: pts/compression-7zip

Focus on multi core CPU. A higher score is better.

Test Hetzner DigitalOcean Linode Vultr OVH UpCloud
Compression Rating (MIPS) 7174 6458 8095 8878 7419 10061
Decompression Rating (MIPS) 5316 5037 6727 6444 5305 7080

Benchmark: pts/stream

Focus on the memory. A higher score is better.

Test Hetzner DigitalOcean Linode Vultr OVH UpCloud
Copy (MB/s) 20308 30553 42336 20552 30527 20895
Scale (MB/s) 21842 16683 26287 20788 14744 21252
Triad (MB/s) 24915 18071 33031 23939 16988 24681
Add (MB/s) 24839 18062 31809 23989 16868 24655

Benchmark: pts/postmark

Focus on the storage. A higher score is better. Each VM used ext4 as its file system.

Test Hetzner DigitalOcean Linode Vultr OVH UpCloud
Disk Transaction Performance (TPS) 2336 2459 3906 2640 2830 2976

Benchmark: pts/speedtest

Focus on the network. Download & upload: a higher score is better. Latency: a lower score is better.

Test Hetzner DigitalOcean Linode Vultr OVH UpCloud
Internet Download Speed (Mbit/s) 2.429 2.596 2.890 3.369 483 913
Internet Upload Speed (Mbit/s) 1.671 1.806 1.851 2.184 491 648
Internet Latency (ms) 5 3 4 3 6 10


It is not our intention to designate "the best" and "the worst" provider based on these tests.

We only compared the technical performance of equivalent virtual machines and did not take into account other services offered by the providers, level of support, SLAs, audits, reliability, global presence, etc.

We made a percentage comparison of each test score. We made a total percentage distribution of all those scores in order to arrive at a final comparison. You can see this in the graph below.

We see that Linode, Vultr and UpCloud score above average and Hetzner and OVH fall below the average monthly cost.

We see that Hetzner, DigitalOcean and OVH have similar scores, but the prices are very different. Linode, Vultr and UpCloud are the strongest in this technical benchmark, of which UpCloud is the most expensive.

Does your workload mainly require CPU power? Then you will be satisfied with UpCloud. Linode shows its strong side when it comes to memory power and speed of its storage space. Vultr stands out for its good bandwidth. Hetzner, DigitalOcean and OVH are evenly matched in many areas, but OVH provides the least bandwidth and Hetzner gives a bang of 20 TB data traffic.

In terms of price-quality, Hetzner makes a very good move.

Try it yourself?

Want to try one of these cloud providers? With the (affiliate) links below you will already receive a starting budget.